Hartford partner Michael Valerio reports on oral argument in the U.S. Supreme Court ERISA case Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma.

Valerio’s article, “Justices Weigh 'Actual Knowledge' Practically in ERISA Case,” discusses the principal arguments the parties presented to the Supreme Court, including some of the justices’ questions and comments relative to those arguments. The article also offers a few observations about potential outcomes and implications going forward, particularly in ERISA class actions alleging fiduciary imprudence in the selection and oversight of investment options offered within defined contribution retirement plans.

Source: Law360
Leave Drinker Biddle to Learn More