Publication - 11/22/2013

FDA Final Guidance on Mobile Medical Applications

Life Sciences Now

On September 23, 2013, the FDA issued a guidance (“Final Guidance”) explaining how medical device regulations will be applied to medical mobile applications (MMAs). The Final Guidance provides mobile application manufacturers with recommendations on how to comply with the regulatory and statutory requirements governing medical devices. The Guidance indicates that the FDA intends to limit its enforcement authority to only those mobile applications that operate as medical devices and pose a significant risk to patients if they fail to function as intended.

The Final Guidance outlines three categories of mobile applications (mobile apps) generally: (1) mobile apps that are not medical devices as defined under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and are therefore not subject to FDA regulation; (2) mobile apps that may meet the definition of a medical device but over which the FDA intends to exercise enforcement discretion because these applications pose a low risk to the public; and (3) mobile apps that meet the definition of a medical device and which the FDA will regulate due to the significant potential risk to patient safety.

To read the entire article, click here.

Overcoming Compliance II

Reactions
Thomas M. Dawson, Joseph L. Seiler III

Socially Responsible Investing in ERISA Plans: The Legal Perspective

Institutional Investor: Foundation & Endowment Money Management
Bruce L. Ashton

Institutional Investor: Foundation & Endowment Money Management

IRS Denies Tax Exemption to Commercial ACO

Health Care Insight
Matthew Amodeo, Taylor Romigh Harrison, Linda S. Moroney, T.J. Sullivan

On April 8, 2016, the IRS released a final adverse exemption determination with respect to an accountable care organization (ACO) formed by an unnamed nonprofit health care system.

Section 201 Safeguard Petition Filed Against Primary Aluminum Could Impact Sourcing

Client Alert
Richard P. Ferrin, Douglas J. Heffner

On April 18, the United Steelworkers union filed a Section 201 “safeguards” petition regarding primary, unwrought aluminum. This case could impact purchasers of primary, unwrought aluminum (such as billets, hollow billets, ingots, sows, and tees) from non-U.S. sources by increasing the prices of these products, decreasing availability, or both.

Donald Trump’s Major Antitrust Encounters

The Antitrust Source
Robert A. Skitol

In the article, Bob attempts to predict how Donald Trump would shape his antitrust enforcement program based on three previous antirust cases he had been involved with in the past.