Publication - 06/22/2012

USPTO Maintains Position on Claim Interpretation in Post-Grant and Inter Partes Reviews

Intellectual Property Alert

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has re-affirmed its decades-old position on claim interpretation in proceedings before the Office. The USPTO has consistently given patent claims their broadest reasonable claim interpretation when examining patent applications. According to the USPTO, that approach provides an appropriate balance between applicants and the public by giving the public an indication of the maximum scope of the claims, while permitting applicants to amend their claims in USPTO proceedings so that they can avoid ambiguities and overly broad claims. The USPTO's goal has been to issue patents that are clear and defensible early in the patent process.

Click on the PDF link above to view the full alert.

05/17/2013

Subsequent Mortgagees Get No Satisfaction From Forged Satisfaction Statement


Joseph N. Argentina, Jr., Andrew C. Kassner

05/16/2013

OIG Issues Updated Bulletin on Exclusions from Federal Health Care Programs

Drinker Biddle Health Care Insight
Anna Schwamlein Howard, Douglas B. Swill

05/14/2013

“When ‘and’ Really Means ‘or’ in a Restrictive Covenant.”

American Healthcare Lawyer Association e-Newsletter
Rachel Ryan

05/13/2013

Retirement Income Team Newsletter

Client Alert
Bruce L. Ashton, John W. Blouch, Mark F. Costley, Bruce W. Dunne, Daniel W. Krane, James C. McMeen, Fred Reish, Joshua J. Waldbeser

05/03/2013

Chapter I: History and Organization of the Antitrust Division and Chapter IX: Consent Decrees

DOJ Civil Antitrust Practice and Procedure Manual
Adam Scott Kunz