Publication - 6/1/2007

Patent Licensing After MedImmune

AHLA's Life Sciences

Los Angeles counsel Paul Gelb co-authored “Patent Licensing After MedImmune” for AHLA's Life Sciences.  The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court’s first patent decision of the 2007 term, MedImmune, Inc. v. Genetech Inc., 127 S. Ct. 764 (2007).  The case places patent licensors in a predicament: licensees may persecute a declaratory judgment action to challenge the licensed patent and simultaneously maintain good standing under the patent license agreement, thereby preventing a countersuit for infringement by the licensor.

Click on the PDF link above to view the full article.

02/27/2013

Drinker Biddle’s HIPAA Compliance Update for Employee Benefit Plans

Client Bulletin

02/27/2013

Supreme Court Affirms Certification Decision in Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans & Trust

Client Alert
Daniel E. Brewer, Michael P. Daly, Susan M. Roach

02/27/2013

Yahoo’s Ban on Working from Home: Does it Raise Red Flags For Other Companies?

Client Alert
Lynne Anne Anderson

02/26/2013

The Benefits of Mandatory Distributions

Drinker Biddle White Paper
Bruce L. Ashton, Fred Reish

02/25/2013

ERISA Newsletter for Retirement Plan Service Providers

Client Newsletter
Fred Reish, Bruce L. Ashton, Joan M. Neri, Joseph C. Faucher, Joshua J. Waldbeser, Bradford P. Campbell