Publication - 6/1/2007

Patent Licensing After MedImmune

AHLA's Life Sciences

Los Angeles counsel Paul Gelb co-authored “Patent Licensing After MedImmune” for AHLA's Life Sciences.  The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court’s first patent decision of the 2007 term, MedImmune, Inc. v. Genetech Inc., 127 S. Ct. 764 (2007).  The case places patent licensors in a predicament: licensees may persecute a declaratory judgment action to challenge the licensed patent and simultaneously maintain good standing under the patent license agreement, thereby preventing a countersuit for infringement by the licensor.

Click on the PDF link above to view the full article.

02/20/2013

Supreme Court’s Decision in FTC v. Phoebe Putney Offers Additional Caution to Health Care Providers Seeking Antitrust Immunity in their Dealings with State or Local Entities

Client Alert
Robert W. McCann, Kenneth M. Vorrasi

02/17/2013

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Examiners Need Time to Ramp Up

The Seattle Times
Robert L. Stoll

02/15/2013

Post-Petition Lock-Up Agreement Permitted by Delaware Bankruptcy Court

The Legal Intelligencer
Andrew C. Kassner, Joseph N. Argentina, Jr.

02/14/2013

CMS’s Final “Sunshine” Rule: Implications for Research

Client Alert
Robyn S. Shapiro, Julie Rusczek

02/14/2013

Providing Guaranteed Lifetime Income Benefits: Managing Fiduciary Responsibility

Client Bulletin
Bruce L. Ashton, Fred Reish