Publication - 6/1/2007

Patent Licensing After MedImmune

AHLA's Life Sciences

Los Angeles counsel Paul Gelb co-authored “Patent Licensing After MedImmune” for AHLA's Life Sciences.  The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court’s first patent decision of the 2007 term, MedImmune, Inc. v. Genetech Inc., 127 S. Ct. 764 (2007).  The case places patent licensors in a predicament: licensees may persecute a declaratory judgment action to challenge the licensed patent and simultaneously maintain good standing under the patent license agreement, thereby preventing a countersuit for infringement by the licensor.

Click on the PDF link above to view the full article.

05/24/2013

Helping Your Plan Sponsor Clients Avoid Prohibited Transactions

NAPA Net
Joan M. Neri, Joshua J. Waldbeser, Bruce L. Ashton, Fred Reish

05/22/2013

The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination in the Antitrust Context

ABA Young Lawyer Division
Todd N. Hutchison

05/22/2013

Ethics Bureau at Yale: Combining Pro Bono Professional Responsibility Advice with Ethics Education

Journal of Legal Education
Lawrence J. Fox

05/17/2013

The FCC Declares Telemarketing by Proxy May Subject Sellers to Vicarious Liability

Client Alert
Laura H. Phillips, Patrick R. McFadden

05/17/2013

Subsequent Mortgagees Get No Satisfaction From Forged Satisfaction Statement


Joseph N. Argentina, Jr., Andrew C. Kassner