Headline - 06/18/2014

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Cancels Washington NFL Team’s Trademark Registrations

The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ruled in favor of the petitioners in Blackhorse v. Pro -Football, Inc,  a landmark case that Drinker Biddle & Reath filed in 2006 on behalf of five Native Americans seeking to cancel trademark registrations of the “Washington Redskins” because the use of the term “redskins” disparages Native Americans.    The case is the culmination and vindication of a multi-decade effort by Native Americans and others who object to the team’s name as derogatory and offensive.

“We are extraordinarily gratified to have prevailed in this case,” said Alfred W.  Putnam, Jr., Chairman of Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.  “The dedication and professionalism of our attorneys and the determination of our clients have resulted in a milestone victory that will serve as an historic precedent,” Putnam said.

The five petitioners, Amanda Blackhorse, Phillip Gover, Marcus Briggs-Cloud, Jillian Pappan and Courtney Tsotigh, came together eight years ago to seek the cancellation of six different trademarks associated with the Washington NFL team.  The federal trademark law does not permit registration of trademarks that “may disparage” individuals or groups or “bring them into contempt or disrepute.”  

“The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board agreed with our clients that the team’s name and trademarks disparage Native Americans.  The Board ruled that the Trademark Office should never have registered these trademarks in the first place,” said Jesse Witten, the lead Drinker Biddle partner litigating this case.  “We presented a wide variety of evidence – including dictionary definitions and other reference works, newspaper clippings, movie clips, scholarly articles, expert linguist testimony, and evidence of the historic opposition by Native American groups – to demonstrate that the word ‘redskin’ is an ethnic slur.”  Witten added.  “This victory was a long time coming and reflects the hard work of many attorneys at our firm.”

To read the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's decision, please click here.

David Woolf Quoted in The Inquirer

Labor and Employment partner David Woolf was recently quoted in a Philadelphia Inquirer article, titled, “New Overtime Reality Starts U.S. Enterprises Strategizing.”

Ken Vorrasi Named to D.C.’s Top 40 Lawyers Under 40 by Trending 40

Ken was nominated by other lawyers and selected from a very large pool of candidates by a committee of professionals with deep experience and expertise in the legal community in Washington, D.C.

Bob Stoll Article Published in The Hill

The article discusses Ariosa Diagnostics v. Sequenom, the decision to deny Sequenom patent protection on a breakthrough invention that could be used to detect abnormalities in an unborn child, and the impact decisions like these have on research, investment and our economy.

Mark Foley Quoted in Human Resource Executive Online Regarding New “Persuader Rule”

Labor and Employment partner Mark Foley was recently quoted in Human Resource Executive Online in an article titled, “Beware the ‘Persuader Rule.”

Ilisa Halpern Paul’s Rise to Success Featured in The Hill

The Hill highlighted Ilisa Halpern Paul, President of the District Policy Group, in an article titled, “Beating the drum on healthcare.” The story focused on Ilisa’s unusual path to K street, her family, and the flood of information on Capitol Hill today.