Headline - 06/18/2014

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Cancels Washington NFL Team’s Trademark Registrations

The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ruled in favor of the petitioners in Blackhorse v. Pro -Football, Inc,  a landmark case that Drinker Biddle & Reath filed in 2006 on behalf of five Native Americans seeking to cancel trademark registrations of the “Washington Redskins” because the use of the term “redskins” disparages Native Americans.    The case is the culmination and vindication of a multi-decade effort by Native Americans and others who object to the team’s name as derogatory and offensive.

“We are extraordinarily gratified to have prevailed in this case,” said Alfred W.  Putnam, Jr., Chairman of Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.  “The dedication and professionalism of our attorneys and the determination of our clients have resulted in a milestone victory that will serve as an historic precedent,” Putnam said.

The five petitioners, Amanda Blackhorse, Phillip Gover, Marcus Briggs-Cloud, Jillian Pappan and Courtney Tsotigh, came together eight years ago to seek the cancellation of six different trademarks associated with the Washington NFL team.  The federal trademark law does not permit registration of trademarks that “may disparage” individuals or groups or “bring them into contempt or disrepute.”  

“The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board agreed with our clients that the team’s name and trademarks disparage Native Americans.  The Board ruled that the Trademark Office should never have registered these trademarks in the first place,” said Jesse Witten, the lead Drinker Biddle partner litigating this case.  “We presented a wide variety of evidence – including dictionary definitions and other reference works, newspaper clippings, movie clips, scholarly articles, expert linguist testimony, and evidence of the historic opposition by Native American groups – to demonstrate that the word ‘redskin’ is an ethnic slur.”  Witten added.  “This victory was a long time coming and reflects the hard work of many attorneys at our firm.”

To read the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's decision, please click here.

Bob Stoll Quoted in Law360

Bob shared his thoughts on the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision not to review the Federal Circuit ruling in Google Inc. v. Oracle America Inc.

Bennett Borden Featured in Bloomberg BNA

Bennett was featured in a discussion on using analytics to develop facts for litigation and other legal outcomes.

Kay Gordon Quoted in HFMweek

Kay commented on the Form BE-10 filing deadline and the concern and confusion from hedge funds and other investors in connection with the deadline.

Ilisa Halpern Paul quoted in The Washington Post

Ilisa was quoted in two articles on the implications of the Supreme Court ruling in King v. Burwell.

Lynne Anderson Quoted in the Star-Ledger

Lynne commented on a recent New Jersey Supreme Court ruling that has implications for employee whistleblowers and workplace discrimination lawsuits.